Rechtsprechung / BPatG / 2005
BPatG Beschluss vom 09.03.2005 – 28 W (pat) 13/04
28. Senat
BUNDESPATENTGERICHT
28 W (pat) 13/04 _______________________
(Aktenzeichen)
…
B E S C H L U S S
In der Beschwerdesache 10.99
betreffend die Marke 300 12 302
hat der 28. Senat (Marken-Beschwerdesenat) des Bundespatentgerichts in der
Sitzung vom 9. März 2005 unter Mitwirkung des Vorsitzenden Richters Stoppel
sowie der Richterin Schwarz-Angele und des Richters Paetzold
beschlossen:
Es wird
festgestellt, daß die Parteien
folgenden Vergleich
geschlossen haben (§ 278 Abs 6 ZPO):
PRIOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT
between
T… N.V.
H… Goeslaan
in E…
N…
- hereinafter called Proprietor -
and
D…
in T…
G…
- hereinafter called Applicant -.
I.
1. Proprietor owns Community Trademark no. 000239905 «DAF« covering
goods and services of classes 7, 12, 25, 32, 35, 36 and 37.
2. Applicant owns German Trademark no. 3001 2 302 »DAE« covering goods
and services of classes 12, 37 and 39 which has been opposed by
Proprietor.
II.
1. Applicant undertakes to derive no rights from the registration and use of the
mark »DAE« against the mark »DAF« of Proprietor, in particular not to
object to any re-registration of this mark or to the use and registration of
marks similar thereto (with the exception of the mark »DAE«).
2. Applicant undertakes not to use the mark »DAE« for
Vehicles and apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, with
the exception of horse transporters, and not in connection with the
maintenance of motor vehicles and not in connection with
transport, with the exception of horse transporters.
Applicant undertakes further to restrict the list of goods and services of
German trademark no. 300 12 302 »DAE« to
Class 12: “Pferdetransporter”;
Class 37:
“Bauwesen;
Installationsarbeiten; Reparturwesen,
nämlich Reparatur, Wartung
und
Instandhaltung
von
Pferdetransportern”,
Class 39: „Pferdetransporte; Verpackung und Lagerung von
Waren; Veranstaltung von Reisen“.
III.
1. Proprietor unterdetakes to tolerate the registration and use of the mark
»DAE« on the conditions set forth above under II.
2. Proprietor further undertakes to withdraw the opposition against German
trademark no. 300 12 302 »DAE« after execution of this agreement and
effecting the restriction according to II.2.
IV.
1. This agreement shall be valid for Germany. Applicant shall allow Proprietor
to register and use his mark under comparable conditions in countries
where Applicant has or acquires prior rights.
2. This Aggrement shall be binding also for affiliated companies of the parties
which use identical marks for the same goods. The parties further
undertake to impose the obligations contained in this agreement onto their
possible successors in right or title.
Stoppel
Paetzold
Schwarz-Angele
Bb