Rechtsprechung / BPatG / 2005

BPatG Beschluss vom 09.03.2005 – 28 W (pat) 13/04

28. Senat

BUNDESPATENTGERICHT

28 W (pat) 13/04 _______________________

(Aktenzeichen)

B E S C H L U S S

In der Beschwerdesache 10.99

betreffend die Marke 300 12 302

hat der 28. Senat (Marken-Beschwerdesenat) des Bundespatentgerichts in der

Sitzung vom 9. März 2005 unter Mitwirkung des Vorsitzenden Richters Stoppel

sowie der Richterin Schwarz-Angele und des Richters Paetzold

beschlossen:

Es wird

festgestellt, daß die Parteien

folgenden Vergleich

geschlossen haben (§ 278 Abs 6 ZPO):

PRIOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT

between

T… N.V.

H… Goeslaan

in E…

N…

- hereinafter called Proprietor -

and

D…

in T…

G…

- hereinafter called Applicant -.

I.

1. Proprietor owns Community Trademark no. 000239905 «DAF« covering

goods and services of classes 7, 12, 25, 32, 35, 36 and 37.

2. Applicant owns German Trademark no. 3001 2 302 »DAE« covering goods

and services of classes 12, 37 and 39 which has been opposed by

Proprietor.

II.

1. Applicant undertakes to derive no rights from the registration and use of the

mark »DAE« against the mark »DAF« of Proprietor, in particular not to

object to any re-registration of this mark or to the use and registration of

marks similar thereto (with the exception of the mark »DAE«).

2. Applicant undertakes not to use the mark »DAE« for

Vehicles and apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, with

the exception of horse transporters, and not in connection with the

maintenance of motor vehicles and not in connection with

transport, with the exception of horse transporters.

Applicant undertakes further to restrict the list of goods and services of

German trademark no. 300 12 302 »DAE« to

Class 12: “Pferdetransporter”;

Class 37:

“Bauwesen;

Installationsarbeiten; Reparturwesen,

nämlich Reparatur, Wartung

und

Instandhaltung

von

Pferdetransportern”,

Class 39: „Pferdetransporte; Verpackung und Lagerung von

Waren; Veranstaltung von Reisen“.

III.

1. Proprietor unterdetakes to tolerate the registration and use of the mark

»DAE« on the conditions set forth above under II.

2. Proprietor further undertakes to withdraw the opposition against German

trademark no. 300 12 302 »DAE« after execution of this agreement and

effecting the restriction according to II.2.

IV.

1. This agreement shall be valid for Germany. Applicant shall allow Proprietor

to register and use his mark under comparable conditions in countries

where Applicant has or acquires prior rights.

2. This Aggrement shall be binding also for affiliated companies of the parties

which use identical marks for the same goods. The parties further

undertake to impose the obligations contained in this agreement onto their

possible successors in right or title.

Stoppel

Paetzold

Schwarz-Angele

Bb